Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ct Scans by Assessment of Image Quality and Confidence

Authors

  • Khaled Sabarna Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Palestine Aliya University (Palestine)
  • Mysara Rumman Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Palestine Aliya University (Palestine)
  • Maryam Hamad Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Palestine Aliya University (Palestine)
  • Mayssa Assaf Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Palestine Aliya University (Palestine)
  • Lana Adileh Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Palestine Aliya University (Palestine)
  • Hadeel Bilbese Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Palestine Aliya University (Palestine)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59994/pau.2022.2.86

Abstract

The study's objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of the abdomen CT scan by the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. As a result, research that can be quantified and measured is done on a representative sample. The CTDIvol data was gathered over three months at the Al Makkased Islamic Charitable Society Hospital in Jerusalem from 123 CT adult belly exams. The study's findings suggest that, in comparison to many other hospitals throughout the world, Al-Makkased hospitals are using the belly examination more frequently. The samples were contrasted with the ICRP's global reference value. Two radiologists were supplied samples with low CTDIvol levels to assess the picture quality and confidence. The study report It was discovered that whereas 39% of the low CTDIvol samples did not affect the picture quality, 61% of the remaining samples did. The first radiologist reported a picture quality of 77% and a certainty of 91%; the second reported a picture quality of 79% and a certainty of 90%. The study discovered that the CT belly examination's CTDIvol was higher than the ICRP's global reference value, that 57 out of 123 samples had low CTDIvol, and that their proportion was 46%. This analysis does not include Japan. The overall picture quality was judged to be fair, while diagnostic certainty was found to be outstanding. Findings highlight discrepancies in radiation dose levels and underscore the importance of balancing dose reduction with diagnostic efficacy, contributing to improved imaging practices and patient safety.

Keywords:

Image Quality CTDIvol, Computed Tomography, Diagnostic Confidence, Radiation Dose

References

Abujudeh, H. H., Boland, G. W., Kaewlai, R., Rabiner, P., Halpern, E. F., Gazelle, G. S., & Thrall, J. H. (2010). Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists. European radiology, 20, 1952-1957.‏

Dewang, S., Abdullah, B., & Tahir, D. (2018, March). Study of Image Quality, Radiation Dose and Low Contrast Resolution from MSCT Head by Using Low Tube Voltage. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 979 (1), p. 012078. IOP Publishing.‏

Esses, D., Birnbaum, A., Bijur, P., Shah, S., Gleyzer, A., & Gallagher, E. J. (2004). Ability of CT to alter decision making in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain. The American journal of emergency medicine, 22(4), 270-272.‏

Fox, J. C., Madoff, S., & Moore, C. (2008). How to Read an Abdominal Computed Tomography Scan.‏

Goldman, L. W. (2007). Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 35(4), 213-225.‏

Hata, A., Yanagawa, M., Honda, O., Kikuchi, N., Miyata, T., Tsukagoshi, S., ... & Tomiyama, N. (2018). Effect of matrix size on the image quality of ultra-high-resolution CT of the lung: comparison of 512× 512, 1024× 1024, and 2048× 2048. Academic radiology, 25(7), 869-876.‏

Hounsfield, G. N. (1976). Picture quality of computed tomography. American journal of Roentgenology, 127(1), 3-9.‏

Huda, W., Ravenel, J. G., & Scalzetti, E. M. (2002, October). How do radiographic techniques affect image quality and patient doses in CT?. In Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, 23(5). 411-422.

Huda, W., Rowlett, W. T., & Schoepf, U. J. (2010). Radiation dose at cardiac computed tomography: facts and fiction. Journal of thoracic imaging, 25(3), 204-212.‏

Huda, W., Schoepf, U. J., Abro, J. A., Mah, E., & Costello, P. (2011). Radiation-related cancer risks in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT. American Journal of Roentgenology, 196(2), W159-W165.‏

Lauzier, P. T., Tang, J., Speidel, M. A., & Chen, G. H. (2012). Noise spatial nonuniformity and the impact of statistical image reconstruction in CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Medical physics, 39(7Part1), 4079-4092.‏

McNitt-Gray, M. F. (2002). AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT: radiation dose in CT. Radiographics, 22(6), 1541-1553.‏

Mettler Jr, F. A., Bhargavan, M., Faulkner, K., Gilley, D. B., Gray, J. E., Ibbott, G. S., ... & Yoshizumi, T. T. (2009). Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology, 253(2), 520-531.‏

Murphy, A., Ekpo, E., Steffens, T., & Neep, M. J. (2019). Radiographic image interpretation by Australian radiographers: a systematic review. Journal of medical radiation sciences, 66(4), 269-283.‏

Pema, D., & Kritsaneepaiboon, S. (2020). Radiation dose from computed tomography scanning in patients at Songklanagarind Hospital: diagnostic reference levels. Journal of Health Science and Medical Research, 38(2), 135-143.‏

Ravenel, J. G., Scalzetti, E. M., Huda, W., & Garrisi, W. (2001). Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. American Journal of Roentgenology, 177(2), 279-284.‏

Rehani, M. M. (2012). ICRP and IAEA actions on radiation protection in computed tomography. Annals of the ICRP, 41(3-4), 154-160.‏

Sherer, M. A. S., Visconti, P. J., Ritenour, E. R., & Kelli Haynes, M. S. R. S. (2013). Radiation protection in medical radiography. Elsevier Health Sciences.‏

Shrimpton, P. C., Jessen, K. A., Geleijns, J., Panzer, W., & Tosi, G. (1998). Reference doses in computed tomography. Radiation protection dosimetry, 80(1-3), 55-59.‏

Sigal-Cinqualbre, A. B., Hennequin, R., Abada, H. T., Chen, X., & Paul, J. F. (2004). Low-kilovoltage multi–detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology, 231(1), 169-174.‏

Taguchi, K., & Aradate, H. (1998). Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi‐slice helical CT. Medical physics, 25(4), 550-561.‏

Tsalafoutas, I. A., & Koukourakis, G. V. (2010). Patient dose considerations in computed tomography examinations. World journal of radiology, 2(7), 262.‏

Wang, J., & Fleischmann, D. (2018). Improving spatial resolution at CT: development, benefits, and pitfalls. Radiology, 289(1), 261-262.‏

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Sabarna, K., Rumman, M., Hamad, M. ., Assaf, M. ., Adileh, L., & Bilbese, H. (2022). Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ct Scans by Assessment of Image Quality and Confidence. Journal of Palestine Ahliya University for Research and Studies, 1(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.59994/pau.2022.2.86

Issue

Section

Articles