اختيار أفضل تقنيات توليد الطاقة باستخدام تحليل اتخاذ القرار متعدد المعايير
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59994/pau.2024.3.27الملخص
إنّ الطلب المتزايد على الطاقة الكهربائية يدفع المهندسين إلى النظر في أنظمة إنتاج الطاقة المستدامة في أوروبا. وتشمل التحديات أمن إمدادات الطاقة، والقدرة على تحمل التكاليف، وكفاءة المواد، وحماية البيئة. وبناءً على عدد من المتغيرات، تسعى هذه الدراسة إلى تحديد التقنيات المستدامة الأكثر فعالية لإنتاج الكهرباء. وهناك الكثير من المعايير المتنافسة في مصادر إنتاج الطاقة؛ وقد تم تطبيق أساليب صنع القرار متعددة المعايير (MCDM)، وأُجري التحليل باستخدام منهجيات MULTIMOORA وVIKOR وTOPSIS. وقد كشفت نتائج طريقة MULTI MOORA عن أفضل محطات توليد الطاقة بالكتلة الحيوية (CHP)؛ ومن خلال VIKOR، كانت أفضل تقنية لإنتاج الكهرباء هي فحم التوربينات المكثف؛ وبالنسبة لـ TOPSIS، كانت أفضل تقنية هي الطاقة الشمسية الكهروضوئية. وقد أظهرت هذه النتائج أن سياسة الطاقة المستقبلية يجب أن تركز على تقنيات الطاقة المستدامة.
الكلمات المفتاحية:
إنتاج الكهرباء، أفضل أداء، الهندسة الكهربائية، الاستدامة، تحليل القرار متعدد المعاييرالتنزيلات
المراجع
Abas, N & Kalair, A & Khan, N. (2015). Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies. Futures, 69, 31–49. doi:10.1016/j. futures. 2015.03.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.003
Ali, T & Ma, H & Nahian, A. J. (2019). An analysis of the renewable energy technology selection in the southern region of Bangladesh using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 9(4), 1838-1848.
Anand, A., & Rufuss, D. D. W., & Rajkumar, V., & Suganthi, L. (2017). Evaluation of sustainability indicators in smart cities for India using MCDM approach. Energy Procedia, 141, 211-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.094
Asif, M. (2009). Sustainable energy options for Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(4), 903-909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.04.001
Kuzemko, C., & Bradshaw, M., & Bridge, G., & Goldthau, A., & Jewell, J., & Overland, I., & Westphal, K. (2020). Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 101685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685
Desideri, U., & Proietti, S., & Zepparelli, F., & Sdringola, P., & Bini, S. (2012). Life cycle assessment of a ground-mounted 1778 kwp photovoltaic plant and comparison with traditional energy production systems. Applied Energy, 97, 930-943, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.055
Evans, A., & Strezov, V., & Evans, T. J. (2009). Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(5), 1082-1088, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008
Gao, R., & Nam, H. O., & Ko, W. I., & Jang, H. (2017). National options for a sustainable nuclear energy system: MCDM evaluation using an improved integrated weighting approach. Energies, 10(12), 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122017
Harjanne, A., & Korhonen, J. M. (2019). Abandoning the concept of renewable energy. Energy policy, 127, 330-340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029
Hrvoje Mikulcic. (2020) Sustainable development using renewable energy technology, Renewable Energy 146 2430-2437 , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.094
www.elsevier.com/locate/renene.
Rezaei, N., Tarimoradi, H., & Deihimi, M. (2022). A coordinated management scheme for power quality and load consumption improvement in smart grids based on sustainable energy exchange based model. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 51, 101903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101903
Khan, S. A. R., & Ponce, P., & Thomas, G., & Yu, Z., & Al-Ahmadi, M. S., & Tanveer,
M. (2021). Digital technologies, circular economy practices and environmental
policies in the era of covid-19. Sustainability, 13(22), 12790.
Lee, H. C., & Chang, C. T. (2018). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92, 883-896, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.007
Lund, H. (2007). Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy, 32(6),912-919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.017
Mandelli, S., & Barbieri, J., & Mattarolo, L., & Colombo, E. (2014). Sustainable
energy in Africa: A comprehensive data and policies review. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 656-686.
Maradin, D., & Cerović, L., & Šegota, A. (2021). The efficiency of wind power companies in electricity generation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 37, 100708, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100708
Markovska, N., & Taseska, V., & Pop-Jordanov, J. (2009). SWOT analyses of the national energy sector for sustainable energy development. Energy, 34(6), 752-756, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.02.006
Nigim, K., Munier, N., & Green, J. (2004). Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy, 29(11), 1775-1791, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.012
Prior, M. J. (1980). The economics of coal and nuclear power plants. The Fast Breeder Reactor: Need? Cost? Risk? 119-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81391-9_11
Bani Hani, E. H., Sinaga, N., Khanmohammdi, S., and Diyoke, C. (2022). Assessment of a waste energy recovery (WER) unit for power and refrigeration generation: Advanced thermodynamic examination. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 52, 102213. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102213
Eryganov, I., Šomplák, R., Nevrlý, V., Osicka, O., and Procházka, V. (2022). Cost-effective municipal unions formation within intermediate regions under prioritized waste energy recovery. Energy 256, 124621. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124621
Quaranta, E., & and Muntean, S. (2023). Wasted and excess energy in the hydropower sector: A European assessment of tailrace hydrokinetic potential, degassing-methane capture and waste-heat recovery. Appl. Energy 329,(120213). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120213
Banos, R., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F., & Montoya, F. G., & Gil, C., & Alcayde, A., & Gómez, J. (2011). Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 1753-1766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.008
Chong, Z. R., & Yang, S. H. B., & Babu, P., & Linga, P., & Li, X. S. (2016). Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: Prospects and challenges. Applied Energy, 162,1633- 1652, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.061
Bundespublikationen (2016). Energy Consumption in Switzerland. Available at: Order number: 805.006.16.d/f Internet: www.bfe.admin.ch/statistics (Accessed April 8, 2020).
Razmjoo, A. A., & Sumper, A., & Davarpanah, A. (2019). Development of sustainable energy indexes by the utilization of new indicators: A comparative study. Energy Reports, 5, 375-383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.006
Shafie, S. M., & Mahlia, T. M. I., & Masjuki, H. H., & Andriyana, A. (2011). Current energy usage and sustainable energy in Malaysia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4370-4377, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.113
Solomon, B. D., & Krishna, K. (2011). The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7422-7431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.009
Tsoutsos, T. D., & Stamboulis, Y. A. (2005). The sustainable diffusion of renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy. Technovation, 25(7),753-761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.12.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.12.003
Wang, C. N., & Huang, Y. F., & Chai, Y. C., & Nguyen, V. T. (2018). A multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) for renewable energy plants location selection in Vietnam under a fuzzy environment. Applied Sciences, 8(11), 2069, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112069
Welch, E., & Barnum, D. (2009). Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation. Ecological Economics, 68(8-9), 2336-2343, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.004
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2024 مجلة جامعة فلسطين الأهلية للبحوث والدراسات

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.